Cases 31 - 40 of 329
Bleuer, et al v. Nigrelli, et al
as 3:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Rev. Justin Bleuer, Berean Bible Church, New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms and others
Defendant:
Kevin P. Bruen, Michael Korchak, Lori Pettit Riemann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Panarello v. Berbenich et al
as 2:2022cv06565
Plaintiff:
Jeff Panarello
Defendant:
Robert Berbenich and Gerber Ciano Kelly Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Scott v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08600
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Mark A. Chancy and others
Wolfson v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08104
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wolfson
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Rafik R. Sidhom and others
Moore v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08518
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
Leyva Jr. v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07805
Plaintiff:
Luis Leyva Jr.
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
Waterman v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08090
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Mark A. Chancy, Vahe A. Dombalagian and others
Whitfield v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08085
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Mark A. Chancy, Vahe A. Dombalagian and others
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Rego Park Pharmacy LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05477
Defendant:
Artur Khaimov, Patricia Kelly, D.O., Rego Park Pharmacy LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
O'Dell v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07751
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Rafik R. Sidhom and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
