Cases 31 - 40 of 211
Liberty Insurance Corporation et al v. Advance Chiropractic PLLC et al
as 2:2022cv11813
Plaintiff:
Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Advance Chiropractic PLLC, Affiliated Diagnostic of Oakland, LLC, Carepointe Physical Therapy LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
America First Insurance Company et al v. Electrostim Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01517
Plaintiff:
America First Insurance Company, American Fire and Casualty Company, American States Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Electrostim Medical Services, Inc. and Mario Garcia, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liberty Mutual Mid Atlantic Insurance Company et al v. Advanced Comprehensive Laboratory, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03541
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Mid Atlantic Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company, LM Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant:
Advanced Comprehensive Laboratory, LLC, Yan Moshe, Mark Gladstein, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. GM Wellness Medical, P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv02064
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant:
GM Wellness Medical, P.C., GM Medical Services, P.C., Gabor Menczelesz, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Stybel et al
as 1:2022cv01710
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant:
Elena Borisovna Stybel, M.D. and John Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ace American Insurance Company et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 4:2022mc00006
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and others
In Re:
Subpoena Ad Testificandum Issued to Thomas M. Sing
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Ace American Insurance Company et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 5:2022mc00110
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and others
In Re:
Subpoena Ad Testificandum Issued to Thomas M. Sing
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et. al. v. MC Physical Therapy, P.C. et. al.
as 2:2021cv06805
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant:
MC Physical Therapy, P.C., Michelle Nesas Cuadra, P.T., Raine M. Pesidas Physical Therapy, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
North Pacific Management, Inc., et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
as 21-35842
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTH PACIFIC MANAGEMENT, INC., an Oregon corporation, DBA Coho Services, DBA Hudsons Hospitality Group, DBA North Pacific Management, AIRPORT INN, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, DBA Airport Inn, DBA Lakeside Bar & Grill & Lakeside Cafe, DBA Radisson Hotel Portland Airport, BPS ASSOCIATES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, DBA Central Eugene Industrial Park, DBA Mountain Park Racquet Club, DBA Timberline Properties, DBA West Hills Racquet Club and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin company
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al v. American Anesthesia Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv12606
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, LM General Insurance Company, LM Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant:
American Anesthesia Associates, LLC, Terence Kimberg, CRNA and David Whitesell, CRNA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
