Cases 31 - 40 of 2,591
USA v. Ponce
as 24-40187
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marvin Ramon Ramos Ponce, also known as Marvin Ramon Ponce, also known as Eddie Ponce Contreras, also known as Eddie Ponce, also known as Rafael Ramos-Egardeo
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Castro Ramos v. Garland
as 24-1706
Petitioner:
LUIS ERASMO CASTRO RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Mariscal v. Garland
as 24-1710
Petitioner:
LUIS RODOLFO RAMOS MARISCAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Zea-Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1408
Petitioner:
KAROL JENNIFER ZEA-RAMOS, JUAN MANUEL AMAYA-AGUIRRE and JOSBA MICHAEL AMAYA-ZEA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Medrano-Ramos
as 24-50154
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Aleyda Medrano-Ramos
Richardson v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH BICK, Director of Correctional Health Care Services, individual and official capacity, JENNIFER BARRETTO, Director of Correctional Health Care Policy and Administration, individual and official capacity and others
Ramos Merino, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1134
Petitioner:
SAUL PABLO RAMOS MERINO, GRACIEL A RAMOS-PUEL, DAPHNE F RAMOS-PUEL and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
