Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Snyder v. Pension Plan for Hourly Employees of United States Pipe and Foundry Company
as 1:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dee Snyder, Sr.
Defendant:
Pension Plan for Hourly Employees of United States Pipe and Foundry Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Castro v. American Capital Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02591
Plaintiff:
Joy Castro
Defendant:
American Capital Associates, LLC and Douglas J. Mackinnon, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Oglesby v. Helton et al
as 1:2010mc00009
Plaintiff:
James W. Oglesby, Sr.
Defendant:
Les Helton, Sabrina Patterson, Southern Health Partners and others
Swinford Trucking, Inc. v. Express Freight Systems, Incorporated et al
as 1:2010mc00024
Plaintiff:
Swinford Trucking, Inc.
Defendant:
Express Freight Systems, Incorporated, Fleet Logistics, Inc. and John A. Limerick, Sr.
Marceaux v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 1:2010mc00004
Plaintiff:
Basil Marceaux, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and Red Bank Concave Government
Watson v. Roaring Creek Stone, Inc
as 3:2010mc00007
In_re:
Pike Nursery Holding, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Watson, Sr
Defendant:
Roaring Creek Stone, Inc
Sisk et al v. Hi-Tech America Development (HAD) III Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jack L. Sisk and Elizabeth M. Sisk
Defendant:
Hi-Tech America Development (HAD) III Corporation, Hi-Tech America Development (HAD) V Corporation, Global Distribution Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Malone v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2009mc00200
Petitioner:
Reginald C. Malone, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Maloney et al v. Disciples Limited, LLC et al
as 3:2008mc00255
Plaintiff:
Nancy Maloney , Bronx Building Baptist Church , Zachary Cain and others
Defendant:
Disciples Limited, LLC, Colvin Enterprises, Inc. and John K. Colvin
Dickens v. Bell et al
as 3:2009mc00123
Petitioner:
Paul O. Dickens, Sr.
Respondent:
Ricky J. Bell and State of Tennessee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
