Other Statutes Cases filed in Texas
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
v. 2007 Yamaha R1 Motorcycle et al
as 3:2010mc00069
Defendant: 2007 Yamaha R1 Motorcycle, 2006 Mercedes Benz E-350, 2006 Toyota Avalon and others
Plaintiff: United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01145
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00070
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lopez et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00292
Plaintiff: Raul Lopez and Diana Lopez
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Christopher Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Type: Other Statutes None
Cole et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00268
Plaintiff: Ronald Lewis Cole, David Lamar Ellis, Jana Ellis and others
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc, Christopher Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Type: Other Statutes None
United States of America v. JP Morgan Chase Acct. XXXX3065 et al
as 3:2009mc00325
Petitioner: United States of America
Respondent: JP Morgan Chase Acct. XXXX3065, JP Morgan Chase Acct. XXXX7522, Bank of America Acct. XXXX1202 and others
Marlin v. Sterling McCall Toyota. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 08-92. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2008mc00092
Plaintiff: Geoffrey A Marlin
Defendant: Sterling McCall Toyota
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation v. Palma et al
as 3:2007cv01248
Plaintiff: Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Defendant: Michael Palma, Paul Gamblin and Daniel Swank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?