Cases 31 - 36 of 36
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION HEALTH & WELFARE FUND et al v. FOUGERA PHARMCEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01753
Plaintiff:
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Movant:
NECA-IBEW WELFARE TRUST FUND , IUOE LOCAL 30 BENEFIT FUND and UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
FOUGERA PHARMCEUTICALS, INC. , HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC. , PERRIGO COMPANY PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND v. FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01754
Plaintiff:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND
Defendant:
FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC. , PERRIGO COMPANY PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PHILADELPHIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01770
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , SANDOZ, INC. , HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND v. AKORN, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01760
Plaintiff:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
AKORN, INC. , FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. v. FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv06644
Plaintiff:
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC., PERRIGO COMPANY PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 2:2008cv02141
Intervenor:
PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC., ASTRAZENECA PLC, URL PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC.
Respondent:
MATTHEW PIKE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
