Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS, INC. et al v. LAHOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01031
Plaintiff:
ANN M. BAAS, LYNNE BERGH, JANICE ANN BOYD and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. CLINE, RAY LAHOOD, VICTOR MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
YOUNG et al v. ALZA COPRORATION et al
as 1:2011mc00014
Defendant:
ALZA COPRORATION, DOES 1 -100 and SANDOZ, INC.
Plaintiff:
STELLA DERUM and ELYSE YOUNG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WALKER YOUNG et al
as 1:2009mc00100
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DONALD ANTHONY WALKER YOUNG, ACORN CAPITOL MANAGEMENT, LLC, ACORN II, L.P. and others
Receiver:
LOUIS C. BECHTLE
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walker Young et al
as 3:2009mc00035
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Donald Anthony Walker Young, Donald Anthony Walker Young and others
Receiver:
Louis C Bechtle, Louis C Bechtle and Louis C Bechtle
Sweeney v. Young Plumbing Inc
as 2:2009mc00007
Plaintiff:
James M Sweeney
Defendant:
Young Plumbing Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
