Cases 41 - 50 of 695
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dobrin v. Twitter et al
as 0:2022cv60941
Plaintiff:
Adam Marshall Dobrin
Defendant:
Twitter, John Does 1-10,000, Google and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Kemp v. Insurance Supermarket Inc.
as 1:2022cv21529
Plaintiff:
Marla Kemp
Defendant:
Insurance Supermarket Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
John Doe, Digital Thrive, LLC and Excel Impact, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
75 Printers Parkway Partners, LLC et al v. Papalini et al
as 6:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
75 Printers Parkway Partners, LLC, Summit Primary and Pain, LLC, Summit Primary Care, PLLC and others
Defendant:
Eric Papalini, Joseph P. Mulvihill, 75 Printers Parkway Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Brad M. Smith
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Trump v. Clinton et al
as 2:2022cv14102
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Trump
Defendant:
Hillary R. Clinton, Democratic National Committee, HFACC, Inc. and others
Appellant:
Alina Habba, Michael T Madaio, Habba Madaio & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MAXWELL v. NELNET INC et al
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
CIARA T. MAXWELL
Defendant:
NELNET INC and JOHN DOES 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Arora v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ashok Arora
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., John Does 1 through 50 and others
Trustee:
Aaron R. Cohen, court-appointed Chapter 7 Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bogle v. Rausch Sturm, LLP et al
as 0:2022cv60171
Plaintiff:
Tano Bogle
Defendant:
Rausch Sturm, LLP, Cascade Capital LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
