Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Johnson et al
as 0:2017cv01101
Defendant:
Christopher Johnson
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv03669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith et al v. Securus Technologies, Inc.
as 0:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
Samantha Smith and Daniel Boyd
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv03372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv02983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Wolfchild et al v. Redwood County et al
as 0:2014cv01597
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Peters Wolfchild , Ernie Peters Longwalker , Scott Adolphson and others
Defendant:
Redwood County , Paxton Township , Sherman Township and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Merrill Lynch International Finance, Inc. et al v. Chaves
as 0:2013cv03177
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch International Finance, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated
Defendant:
Allen Chaves
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Smith Town Corp. et al v. PCP Franchising, LLC et al
as 0:2013mc00092
Petitioner:
Smith Town Corp. , Steven Terk , Ilyne Mendelson and others
Respondent:
PCP Franchising, LLC and Irving Place Capital
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
