Cases 41 - 50 of 469
Eisenberg v. Alterna Capital Solutions, LLC
as 2:2022cv11744
Plaintiff:
Receiver Scott E. Eisenberg and Scott E. Eisenberg
Defendant:
Alterna Capital Solutions, LLC
Schroeder v. Schroeder
as 3:2022cv11509
Plaintiff:
Chris J. Schroeder
Defendant:
Darryl E. Schroeder
RA & E, Inc., d/b/a Lucky 7 v. United States of America, Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), and Retailer Operations Division
as 2:2022cv11291
Plaintiff:
RA & E, Inc., d/b/a Lucky 7
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), and Retailer Operations Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Powell, et al. v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 5:2022cv10816
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliot Powell sui juris, Settlor and Trust Protector of Family of Truh Allah [Irrevocable Express] Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent, Michael Elliot Powell sui juris, Settlor and Trust Protector of Family of Truth Allah [Irrevocable Express] Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent and Family of Trust Allah Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Detroit, City of and others
Malik v. D&W Awning & Window Co. et al
as 1:2022cv10664
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Malik and Jason M. Malik [E-Filer]
Defendant:
D&W Awning & Window Co., Hutchinson, Warren & Associates, Inc., Muller, Muller, Richmond & Harms, P.C. and others
Price v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv10662
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Price
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.