Cases 41 - 50 of 353
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
GOLDBERG et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID GOLDBERG and DMG PUBLISHING LLC
Defendant:
MARK E. BROWN, LEAP INDUSTRIES, DEVEION TOUSSANT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RAMOS v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
RUTH RAMOS
Defendant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. CABRERA et al
as 2:2021cv20787
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO CABRERA Individually, and as officer, director, shareholder, and/or principal of ABC Corp. d/b/a Sushitobox and ABC CORP. doing business as SUSHITOBOX
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv20173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv20098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Two Hands IP LLC v. Two Hands America, Inc
as 21-2538
Appellant:
Two Hands IP LLC
Counter Claimant:
Two Hands America, Inc
Defendant:
ABC Corps. 1100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2428
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
