Other Statutes Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
IN RE: CLARK
as 1:2010mc00169
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent: TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00520
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00521
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WILLIAMSON et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv01456
Plaintiff: AFEWERKI ABEBE, ODEY AGI, MALCOLM BELFROM, JR. and others
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS-DISTRICT LODGE 141-M and UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Claimant: MICHAEL M OLSON
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00737
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: BANIK et al
as 1:2009mc00054
Respondent: MICHAEL J. KIAS, HEATHER L. CLARK-REYNOLDS, RICKY D. DOYLE and others
In Re: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASES OF:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CLARK
as 2:2008mc00008
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CLARK
Strategic Maintenance Solutions Inc v. Practive Solutions Inc et al
as 1:2008mc00003
Plaintiff: Strategic Maintenance Solutions Inc
Defendant: Practive Solutions Inc, Kevin D Clark and G Michael Cooper
IN RE: CLE REQUIREMENTS
as 1:2008mc00093
Respondent: BRENDAN EDWARD WALKER, ROBERT GREGORY FORBES, LEWIS GLENN BENHAM and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?