Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Moore et al v. Svehlak et al
as 1:2012cv02727
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore and Felicia W. Moore
Defendant:
Robert S. Svehlak , Neil D. Roseman , Beverly J. Svehlak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02373
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Governor Martin O'Malley, Lt. Gov Anthony G. Brown, Hon. Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02371
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02370
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02372
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Cardinal Financial Company, L.P. et al
as 1:2012cv01824
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore
Defendant:
Cardinal Financial Company, L.P., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., E & W Realty, LLC and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Cardinal Growth, L.P.
as 1:2011mc00274
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cardinal Growth, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Gragossian v. Cardinal Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00982
Petitioner:
Seda Gragossian
Respondent:
Cardinal Health, Inc., Cardinal Health 303, Inc., Cardinal Health Resources, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
