Cases 41 - 50 of 113
Liu v. City of Allen et al
as 4:2017cv00874
Plaintiff:
Hao Liu
Defendant:
City of Allen, DataProse, Morgan Crossing Owners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
A2D Enterprises, LLC et al v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company
as 6:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
A2D Enterprises, LLC, BeverlyRuth, LLC, Kerrie Chatelain and others
Garnishee:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Collins v. Texas Office of Attorney General
as 4:2017mc02482
Plaintiff:
Earl Collins, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Office of Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Application for IFP
Orix Financial Services, Inc. v. Pacific Western Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2017mc00070
Plaintiff:
Orix Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Pacific Western Transportation, Inc. and Douglas D Collins
Anderson v. Comenity Capital Bank
as 4:2017cv02566
Plaintiff:
Collin Anderson
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Anderson v. Bluestem Brands, Inc. d/b/a Fingerhut
as 4:2017cv02567
Plaintiff:
Collin Anderson
Defendant:
Bluestem Brands, Inc. d/b/a Fingerhut
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Nyabwa v. Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2017mc01433
Plaintiff:
Collins O. Nyabwa
Defendant:
Houston Police Department, HPD Officer and HPD Chief
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Riley et al v. Collection Management Company
as 5:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Kiki Ball, Raymond Collins, Jennifer Piernik and others
Defendant:
Collection Management Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Ashraf v. Energy Transfer Partners LP et al
as 3:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Arsalan Ashraf
Defendant:
Energy Transfer Partners LP , Energy Transfer Partners GP LP , Energy Transfer Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
