Cases 41 - 50 of 380
Vince G Meyer v. Carmichael et al
as 1:2020cv04244
Defendant:
Tayfun Tuzun, Marsha C Williams, Gary R Heminger and others
Plaintiff:
Vince G Meyer Trust and Vince G. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Daniel W. Hamblin, D.V.M., P.C. d/b/a ALPINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL, LTD. v. AMERICAN IV PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2022cv02561
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Hamblin, D.V.M., P.C. d/b/a ALPINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL, LTD.
Defendant:
AMERICAN IV PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Daniele v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2022cv03054
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ERIC DANIELE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. CONSULATE GENERAL CIUDAD JUAREZ, MEXICO, Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Fryer v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2022cv02432
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fryer, IV
Defendant:
Rahm Emanuel, Keith Hill, Kathryn Lunde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel W. Hamblin, D.V.M. P.C. v. International Surgical Products, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02233
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Hamblin, D.V.M. P.C. an Illinois professional corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons doing business as Apline Animal Hospital, Ltd.
Defendant:
International Surgical Products, Inc. an Illinois corporation doing business as Rica Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hamblin v. Anicell Biotech LLC
as 1:2022cv02236
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Hamblin D.V.M., P.C., individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons; an Illinois professional corporation doing business as Alpine Animal Hospital, Ltd.
Defendant:
Anicell Biotech LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hill et al v. Cargo Runner Co.
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Leslie Hill, Daniel Quaca and Cheyenne Quaca
Defendant:
Cargo Runner Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shah v. PayPal, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
Vivek Shah
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc. and Daniel H. Schulman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brown v. Deere & Co.
as 3:2022cv50039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Ostego Forestry Services
Defendant:
Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
