Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Christensen v. Sur La Table, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11357
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Christensen
Defendant:
Sur La Table, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Adamo, et al. v. Genzyme Corporation, et al.
as 1:2013cv11336
Plaintiff:
Philip Adamo , James Beadnell , Joy Beadnell and others
Defendant:
Genzyme Corporation and Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv12126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Romelus et al v. Bonnet et al
as 1:2012cv12095
Plaintiff:
Barthe Romelus, Barthine Noel and Arnold Noel
Defendant:
Jean S.F. Bonnet, Sara Osman, Loredana Devardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv11960
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11524
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jarvis et al v. Village Vault, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv40032
Plaintiff:
Russell Jarvis , James Jarvis , Robert Crampton and others
Defendant:
Village Vault, Inc. and Mary Elizabeth Heffernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis et al v. Village Vault, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv40032
Plaintiff:
Russell Jarvis , James Jarvis , Robert Crampton and others
Defendant:
Village Vault, Inc. and Mary Elizabeth Heffernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mairs et al v. Uxbridge Public Schools
as 4:2011cv40026
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mairs and Elizabeth Mairs
Defendant:
Uxbridge Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
