Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Franklin Cardwell & Jones, P.C. v. Hammond
as 4:2015cv03135
Plaintiff:
Franklin Cardwell & Jones, P.C.
Defendant:
S Robert Hammond
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Preferred Pump & Equipment, L.P. v. Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
as 4:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
Preferred Pump & Equipment, L.P.
Defendant:
Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manning v. Franklin et al
as 4:2014mc02400
Plaintiff:
Danita Manning
Defendant:
Alicia K Franklin, Denise V Pratt, Beth A Klein and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miller et al v. Global Geophysical Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00708
Petitioner:
Dan Mancuso, William F. Drees, III, William A. Falter and others
Defendant:
UHY LLP, Yongtong Lan, P. Matthew Verghese and others
Plaintiff:
Britt Miller, Bret Gould and Billy Rinn
Consolidated Defendant:
Sean M. Gore
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Leslie Trinin and Janice Gibson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Franklin v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv04269
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Derrick Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Simms v. Wal Mart
as 7:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Franklin Shane Simms
Defendant:
Wal Mart
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Simms v. Wal Mart DO NOT DOCKET CASE TRANSFERRED TO MCALLEN DIVISION
as 1:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Franklin Shane Simms
Defendant:
Wal Mart
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
