Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Davison et al
as 3:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. and Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Burton Davison and Second Time Around, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Delvichio et al
as 3:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. and Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
David Delvichio, Davina Delvichio, Nichole Delvichio and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Delvichio et al
as 3:2008cv00144
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. and Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
David Delvichio, Davina Delvichio, Nichole Delvichio and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Banasik et al
as 4:2008cv00468
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. and Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Alex Banasik, Andy hoffman, mark gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Owens v. University Fidelity Corp
as 5:2007cv04033
Plaintiff:
Joe Owens
Defendant:
University Fidelity Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Owens v. Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd
as 5:2007cv04031
Plaintiff:
Joe Owens
Defendant:
Phillips and Cohen Associates, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Owens v. Collectors Training Institute of Illinois Inc
as 5:2007cv04032
Plaintiff:
Joe Owens
Defendant:
Collectors Training Institute of Illinois Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Owens v. Central Credit Services Inc
as 5:2007cv04029
Plaintiff:
Joe Owens
Defendant:
Central Credit Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Leeper v. Smith et al
as 4:2007cv00046
Petitioner:
Katherine Leeper
Respondent:
Joe Smith and Kevin Concannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
