Other Statutes Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00133
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KELLY v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 1:2014cv01499
Plaintiff: SHARLOT KELLY
Defendant: KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01262
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent: JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
CMCO MORTGAGE LLC v. MALONE, et al
as 4:2014mc00005
Plaintiff: CMCO MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant: KELLY F. MALONE and ROBERT B. MALONE
GILES v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC
as 1:2014cv00598
Defendant: ASSET ACCEPTANCE LLC
Plaintiff: KELLI GILES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: KELLY
as 1:2014mc00035
In Re: A SUSPENDED MEMBER OF THE STATE BAR OF ARIZONA
Respondent: HUBERT E. KELLY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02020
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01416
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DENNEY et al v. DENNEY et al
as 1:2013cv01380
Defendant: KELLY BODETTE, CLINICAL CHEMISTRY SPECIALISTS CORP., DEREK COLE and others
Plaintiff: CHAD DENNEY and MARY DENNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?