Other Statutes Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Stoe v. Fosston Family Dental et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv02673
Plaintiff: Tammy Lynn Stoe
Defendant: Fosston Family Dental, Sandwick Orthodontics Inc., Todd Sandwick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Stoe v. D.W. Jones Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv02672
Plaintiff: Tammy Lynn Stoe
Defendant: D.W. Jones Management Inc., Michelle Clodfeller, Donna K. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Stoe v. RHR Information Services Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv02671
Plaintiff: Tammy Lynn Stoe
Defendant: RHR Information Services Inc. and Experian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Behm et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv02580
Plaintiff: William P. Behm, William P. Behm, William P. Behm and others
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Shires v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02574
Plaintiff: Lynne Shires and Lynne Shires
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
USA v. Martin
as 0:2009cr00266
Defendant: Susan Lynn Martin
Plaintiff: USA
Susan Lynn Martin
as 0:2009cr00266
Defendant: Susan Lynn Martin
Plaintiff: USA
Natalie Lynn Bartell
as 0:2009cr00226
Defendant: Natalie Lynn Bartell
Plaintiff: USA
William Lynn Isham
as 0:2009cr00222
Defendant: William Lynn Isham and William Lynn Isham
Plaintiff: USA
USA v. Isham
as 0:2009cr00222
Defendant: William Lynn Isham and William Lynn Isham
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?