Cases 41 - 49 of 49
James Nolan v. Los Angeles City of, et al
as 2:2003cv02190
Plaintiff:
Dean Anderson, Roy P Ballesteros, Jason Lee Beatty and others
Unknown:
Attorney Settlement Officer Coordinator, Gregory G Petersen, Gregory G Petersen and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Movant:
Helen Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Nolan McSwain v. S. A. Holencik
as 2:2009cv07605
Petitioner:
Nolan McSwain
Respondent:
S. A. Holencik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
In the Matter of Nolan Anthony DelCampo - # 1522113
as 3:2009mc80260
Respondent:
Nolan Anthony DelCampo
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Ezike v. Mittal et al
as 4:2008cv01867
Plaintiff:
Romeo Ezike
Defendant:
Lakshmi Mittal, DHL, Cook County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Anthony Falkowski et al
as 2:2008cv06070
Plaintiff:
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Anthony Falkowski and Kimberly Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Baytree Capital Assoicates, L.L.C. et al v. Nolan Quan et al
as 2:2008cv02822
Defendant:
Access Media Networks, Inc., Access Media Technologies, L.L.C., Alchemy Communicatin Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Access Media Technologies LLC, Broadcaster LLC, Michael Gardner and others
Counter Defendant:
Baytree Capital Associates, LLC and Roes
Plaintiff:
Baytree Capital Assoicates, L.L.C.
Counter Claimant:
Broadcaster, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Broadcaster, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Paul Goodman et al v. Broadcaster, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02848
Defendant:
Broadcaster, Inc., Blair Mills, Nolan Quan and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Goodman and Paul Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Duong et al v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv03018
Plaintiff:
Nolan Wai-Yip Duong and Amber Yi Shao
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff and Robert S. Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v.O'Donnell et al.
as 3:2007cv01324
Movant:
ACLU-NJ
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Cathleen O'Donnell, AT&T Corp., Verizon Communications, Inc. and others
Amicu:
Department of the Public Advocate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
