Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Gerald Rucker, et al. v. Pneumo-Abex Corp., et al.
as ILC/2:01-CV-02312
Defendant:
Pneumo-Abex Corp
Plaintiff:
Gerald Rucker
Jack Hamill, et al. v. Pneumo-Abex Corp., et al.
as PAE/2:01-CV-05979
Plaintiff:
Jack Hamill
Defendant:
Pneumo-Abex Corp
Sarlouis v. American Standard
as VAE/2:00-CV-04107
Plaintiff:
Sarlouis and Joseph B. Sarlouis
Defendant:
American Standard, Dana Corp., American Standard, Inc. and others
Bobby Lee Hackworth v. Pneumo Abex Corp., et al.
as MOE/4:00-CV-00354
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Hackworth
Defendant:
Pneumo Abex Corp
State of California, et al v. Remco Hydraulics Inc, et al
as 3:1996cv00283
Plaintiff:
State of California , City of Willits and Willits Environmental Remediation Trust
Defendant:
Remco Hydraulics Inc , M-C Industries Inc , Pneumo Abex Corp and others
Trustee:
Barry L. Williams and AMF Remediation Corporation
Miscellaneou:
Willits Citizens Advisory Committee
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
PNEUMO ABEX CORP., et al v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO, et al
as 1:1982cv02098
Defendant:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, THE , LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP , TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, THE , LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, THE , LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP and TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cross_claimant:
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter_claimant:
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY
Third_party_defendant:
ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. , NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. , NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY , NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. and others
Plaintiff:
PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION
Movant:
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY
Intervenor_plaintiff:
WHITMAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
