Cases 41 - 50 of 9,668
United States of America v. Baldwin Pattie Drug Store, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
BALDWIN PATTIE DRUG STORE, LLC and MATTHEW D. KRAWCZAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Postma
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy L. Postma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michigan, State of v. Lewis
as 2:2024cv10151
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of
Defendant:
Aaron Bradford Lewis
United States of America v. Postma
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy L. Postma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Fogazzi et al
as 2:2024mc50035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Fogazzi and Manpreet Bhagtana
Petitioner:
NewRez, LLC Doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
United States of America v. Thomas
as 2:2023mc51772
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Janard Thomas
Jackson v. State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
as 2:2023cv13279
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson
Defendant:
State of Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency
United States of America v. Angenesis Capital Partners SBIC Fund, L.P.
as 2:2023mc51769
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angenesis Capital Partners SBIC Fund, L.P.
Receiver:
U.S. Small Business Administration
California, State of v. G.S. Electech, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv13260
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
G.S. Electech, Inc., G.S. Wiring Systems, Inc. and G.S.W. Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America v. Kazkaz
as 2:2023mc51748
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mohammed Kazkaz
Petitioner:
Prasad Legal PLLC and Move Your Feet
Claimant:
BIG BOY LLC, Big Boy Restaurant Group, LLC, Big Boy Restauraunt Affiliates, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
