Cases 41 - 50 of 270
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
as 1:2016cv00920
Relator:
MICHELLE CALDERON
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KHADER et al
as 1:2017cv04561
Defendant:
ZIAD I. KHADER, NEIL H. PATEL and NIKHIL H. PATEL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunction against Fraud
IN RE: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
as 1:2017mc00069
Petitioner:
BADLANDS NGLS LLC
In Re:
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA ISSUED TO NON-PARTY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CEI COMMUNITY VENTURES, LLC
as 1:2017mc00067
Defendant:
CEI COMMUNITY VENTURES, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
$19,900.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 1:2017mc00062
In Re:
$19,900.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
$14,040.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 1:2017mc00050
In Re:
$14,040.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. INDIANAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2015cv00425
Plaintiff:
QUINN R. HEATH and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Relator:
RODNEY C. HEATH
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
$20,387.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 1:2017mc00020
In Re:
$20,387.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dellenbach v USA
as 3:2017mc00008
Plaintiff:
Randall Dellenbach
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Lazzaro, et al v. United States of America
as 2:2017mc00009
Movant:
Domenico Lazzaro, M.D. and Associated Pathologists of Munster, Indiana
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
