Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 322
Ogles v. Security Benefit Life Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02265
Plaintiff: Albert Ogles
Defendant: Security Benefit Life Insurance Company, Security Benefit Corporation, Guggenheim Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
7 West 57th Street Realty Comp v. Citigroup, Inc.
as 18-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant: 7 West 57th Street Realty Company, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellee: Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Bank of America Corporation and others
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Bank of America Corporation
as 18-746
Plaintiff: Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority, Carpenters Pension Fund of West Virginia, Metzler Investment GmbH and others
Petitioner: Bank of America Corporation, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Respondent: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Jennie Stuart Medical Center, Inc., City of New Britain and others
Defendant: Barclays Bank PLC, Citibank, N.A., HSBC Holdings PLC and others
FTC Capital GMBH v. Credit Suisse Group AG
as 18-728
Plaintiff: FTC Capital GMBH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, The Berkshire Bank and others
Petitioner: FTC Futures Fund SICAV, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Metzler Investment GmbH and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico
Respondent: UBS AG and Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A.
Defendant: Credit Suisse Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and others
The Berkshire Bank v. Bank of America Corporation
as 18-718
Plaintiff: Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and Directors Financial Group
Petitioner: The Berkshire Bank, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Citigroup, Inc. and others
Defendant: Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Barclays Bank PLC, British Bankers' Association and others
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bank of America, N.A. et al.
as 1:2018cv01540
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank PLC, British Bankers' Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Irving H. Picard, Trustee for
as 17-3862
Debtor: In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Intervenor: Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Appellant: Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Appellee: ABN AMRO Bank N.V., presently known as The Royal Bank of Scotland, N.V.
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 17-3825
Petitioner: The Berkshire Bank and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico
Respondent: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. and others
O'Sullivan et al v. Deutsche Bank AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv08709
Plaintiff: Sonja Ruhren, Andrew Pearcy, Jonathan F. Kuniholm and others
Defendant: Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, BNP Paribas S.A., Credit Suisse AG and others
Interested Party: United States Attorney's Office (S.D.N.Y.) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: New York County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
In re: Irving H. Picard, Trustee for
as 17-3340
Debtor: In re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Petitioner: Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Respondent: ABN AMRO Bank N.V., personally known as The Royal Bank of Scotland, N.V.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?