Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 123
Fabarc Steel Supply, et al v. OSHA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4102
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: FABARC STEEL SUPPLY, INC. and TONY PUGH
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration and MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor
State of Florida, et al v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4097
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Media Guild of the West v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4103
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: MEDIA GUILD OF THE WEST, THE NEWS GUILD-COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 39213
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AFT Pennsylvania v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4099
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: AFT PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
MCP No.165, OSHA Covid Rule We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7000
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ, aka 32BJ SEIU, AFT PENNSYLVANIA and others
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration, JAMES FREDERICK, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
Amicus Curiae: NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, GAVEL PROJECT and others
Intervenor: CHUCK WINDER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Idaho State Senate, SCOTT BEDKE, in his offical capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives of the State of Idaho, JOSE A. PEREZ and others
Abadi v. Occupational Safety and Health
as 21-2842
Petitioner: Aaron Abadi
Respondent: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor
Republican National Committee v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.
as DC/1:21-CA-01215
Plaintiff: Republican National Committee
Defendant: Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Massachusetts Building Trades Council v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
as 01/1:21-CA-01926
Plaintiff: Massachusetts Building Trades Council
Defendant: Occupational Safety and Health Administration
DTN Staffing Inc., et al v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.
as 08/1:21-CA-03540
Plaintiff: DTN Staffing Inc
Defendant: Occupational Safety and Health Administration
MFA Inc., et al. v. U.S. Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration
as 08/1:21-CA-03556
Plaintiff: MFA Inc
Defendant: U.S. Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?