Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Marcato LP et al v. Signet Jewelers Limited et al
as 1:2019cv09917
Defendant:
Mark Light, Signet Jewelers Limited, Ronald Ristau and others
Plaintiff:
Marcato International Master Fund, LTD. and Marcato LP
Aiello et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv09647
Defendant:
Sanjai Bhonsle, Karen Reidy, Michael Cornell and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Drapkin, Michael J. Palmer, Lawrence G. Kaye and H. Anne Kaye 1996 Revocable Living Trust and others
City of San Jose, California et al v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019cv09359
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, David A Sackler, Jonathan D Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
City of Kenosha, Wisconsin, City of Wiggins, Mississippi, City of Alamogordo, New Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Make the Road New York et al v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2019cv07993
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Kevin K. McAleenan, Ken Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Charities Community Services (Archdiocese of New York), Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Make the Road New York and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Public Health Association, Congressional Tri-Caucus, American Academy of Nursing and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Asian Americans Advancing Justice/Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund/National Women's Law Center, Economic Progress Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae:
Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of New York et al v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al
as 1:2019cv05434
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Colorado, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Softbank Group Corp., T-Mobile US, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and others
Petitioner:
Charter Communications, Inc., Altice USA, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant:
Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pennant Master Fund LP et al v. Signet Jewelers Limited et al
as 1:2019cv02757
Defendant:
Mark Light, Signet Jewelers Limited, Ronald Ristau and others
Plaintiff:
Pennant Windward Master Fund, LP and Pennant Master Fund LP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
