Cases 51 - 60 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
FEINSTEIN v. STONEGATE MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2017cv00794
Defendant:
KEVIN BHATT, JAMES BROWN, RICHARD A. KRAEMER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FEINSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
PARSHALL v. STONEGATE MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2017cv00711
Defendant:
KEVIN BHATT, JAMES BROWN, HOME POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TRAHAN v. INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP INC., ET AL
as 1:2016cv03161
Defendant:
DONALD E. BROWN, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KARL TRAHAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
FISCHER v. INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02666
Defendant:
DONALD E. BROWN, MITCHELL E. DANIELS, EDWARD L. HAMBURG and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FISCHER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2016mc00044
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
JON WINSTON ACKERSON, GARLAN LEIGH ADAMS, BRADLEY JOHNSTON ADAMSKY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
