Cases 51 - 60 of 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Conway et al v Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv01349
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Conway , Corey Musselman , San Antonio Orthopaedic Group LLP and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Incorporated, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Network F.O.B. Incorporated v. H & E Equipment Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00490
Plaintiff:
Network F.O.B. Incorporated
Defendant:
H & E Equipment Services Incorporated and D & A Towing LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
CNG Ranch Market LLC v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
CNG Ranch Market LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, Tom Vilsack, United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Bonham v. Transworld Systems Incorporated
as 2:2014cv02692
Defendant:
Transworld Systems Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey H Bonham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bigham v. U.S. Collections West Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv02438
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Bigham
Defendant:
U.S. Collections West Incorporated and Alan H. Zimmerman PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
