Cases 51 - 60 of 75
City of Annapolis v. Bowen, Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv02558
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis
Defendant:
Edgar A Bowen, Jr., Kenneth S Ashton, Gene Craig Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gwendolyn Laverne Jackson et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, et al.
as 8:2014cv02523
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Laverne Jackson and Ainsworth Charles Jackson
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation , JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. , Matthew A. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Dancel et al
as 1:2014cv02375
Plaintiff:
Laverne Jones , Stacey Jones and Kerry Ness
Defendant:
Bernaldo Dancel , Amerix Corporation , 3CI, Inc. and others
Amicu:
Civil Justice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
WASHINGTON v. DONAHOE et al
as 8:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe, PRINCE JONES, NIGEL MCCLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ITPE Pension Fund et al v. Stronghold Security, LLC
as 8:2012mc00165
Plaintiff:
ITPE Pension Fund , Dennis R. Arrington , Jerry M. Bowden and others
Defendant:
Stronghold Security, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Carrie Bell, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Carrie Bell, Inc., Karen Jones and Renell Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In the matter of the arbitration between Laverne Jones et al
as 1:2011cv02192
Plaintiff:
Laverne Jones , Stacey Ness and Kerry Ness
Respondent:
Genus Credit Management Corporation , Incharge Institute of America, Inc. , Amerix Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Jones v. State of Maryland State's Attorney Office
as 1:2010cv03427
Plaintiff:
Gil W. Jones
Defendant:
State of Maryland State's Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
