Cases 51 - 60 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta v. A & G Management Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00515
Plaintiff:
Mark Acosta
Defendant:
A & G Management Co., Inc. , Merton E. Cohen , Danielle Fowlkes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC et al v. Fesenko et al
as 1:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and VLS Securities LLC
Defendant:
Victor Fesenko, Nataliya Fesenko, CIP and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Direct Benefits, LLC, et al v. TAC Financial Inc., et al.
as 1:2013cv01185
Plaintiff:
Direct Benefits, LLC and Andrew C. Gellene
Defendant:
Roy H Eder, Rhett McNulty, Clark McNutly and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Advanced Career Technologies, Inc. v. John Does 1-10
as 1:2013cv01140
Plaintiff:
Advanced Career Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Movant:
Daniel Drasin
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
