Cases 51 - 60 of 421
Lee Compton v. John Does 1-10
as 4:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Lee Compton
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Salaiz v. Palmetto Clean Technology, Inc., Delaware Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Erik Salaiz
Defendant:
Palmetto Clean Technology, Inc., Delaware Corporation and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Salaiz v. Equisolar, Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Erik Salaiz
Defendant:
Equisolar, Inc and John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Salaiz v. Oscar Insurance Company of Florida et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Erik Salaiz
Defendant:
Oscar Insurance Company of Florida and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Presta v. Doe
as 1:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Scott Presta
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sims v. Memorial Hermann Health System et al
as 4:2021cv04225
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Sims
Defendant:
Memorial Hermann Health System and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
