Cases 51 - 60 of 1,141
Forshey v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
John Paul Forshey
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A. v. Capital Accounts, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Prairie Pointe Orthodontics, P.A.
Defendant:
Capital Accounts, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hughes v. Western Express, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Hughes
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights
Silvernagel v. Pathgroup Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
Sean Silvernagel
Defendant:
Pathgroup Holdings, LLC, Associated Pathologists II, P.C., Ben Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe #14 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
John Doe #14
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montpelier v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dale J Montpelier and Dale J Montpelier, Sr.
Defendant:
John & Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmseth v. Page et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charles Holmseth
Defendant:
Levi Henry Page, Alexandria Hannelore Goddard, John Doe 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cochran v. eMortgage Lending, Inc. et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Cochran
Defendant:
eMortgage Lending, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Doe #13 v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
John Doe #13
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Snider v. Biden
as 3:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
John Michael Snider
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
