Cases 51 - 60 of 62
BANKOFF v. SPISAK et al
as 2:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BANKOFF
Defendant:
SPISAK, ELLIOT, MACKLUSO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KIRSCHNER v. WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv01518
Plaintiff:
MARC S. KIRSCHNER
Defendant:
WACHOVIA CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ARONSON v. NEU et al
as 2:2008cv01368
Plaintiff:
MARK B. ARONSON
Defendant:
GREGORY NEU
Garnishee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HAMLER v. MARSHALL, GREENE & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv04588
Plaintiff:
KURTIS HAMLER
Defendant:
MARSHALL, GREENE & ASSOCIATES, INC., PROFILE MANAGEMENT, INC., MONTEL JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. PATRICK et al
as 2:2007mc00175
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHARLES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DEVAL PATRICK, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY, MAUREEN E. WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SUITT v. MARSHALL & ZIOLKOWSKI ENTERPRISE, L.L.C.
as 2:2007cv00469
Plaintiff:
LORI SUITT
Defendant:
MARSHALL & ZIOLKOWSKI ENTERPRISE, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA/US Marshal v. Apartment C22, 115 Bridlewood Way, York, PA 17402
as 1:2007mc00027
Plaintiff:
USA/US Marshal
Defendant:
Apartment C22, 115 Bridlewood Way, York, PA 17402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
