Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Arnold v. Brock & Scott PLLC et al
as 2:2010cv02115
Plaintiff:
Mary Leigh Arnold
Defendant:
Brock & Scott PLLC and Bullhead Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Novak
as 2:2010cv01794
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Jeffrey Scott Novak
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Scott's End Zone Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00806
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Scott's End Zone Inc and Scott E Sheedy
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Sowinski v. Brock & Scott PLLC
as 6:2010cv00456
Plaintiff:
Bob Sowinski
Defendant:
Brock & Scott PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robertson v Sea Pines Real Estate
as 9:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Albert Robertson, Albert Robertson, Albert Robertson and others
Defendant:
Sea Pines Real Estate Companies Inc, Coastal Homes and Land Inc, Collins Group Realty Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Scott et al v. McCory
as 2:2009mc00143
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G Scott and Lila M Scott
Defendant:
James Roy McCory
Valentine v. Brock & Scott PLLC
as 2:2009cv02555
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Valentine
Defendant:
Brock & Scott PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kirby v. Brock & Scott PLLC et al
as 4:2009cv01276
Plaintiff:
Ginger L Kirby
Defendant:
Brock & Scott PLLC and Bullhead Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Scott v. Titlemax of Columbia et al
as 3:2009cv01032
Plaintiff:
Maurice Scott
Defendant:
Titlemax of Columbia and Titlemax Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Richardson v. Ultimate Warranty Corporation, The et al
as 3:2008mc00077
Plaintiff:
Scott H Richardson
Defendant:
Ultimate Warranty Corporation, The, Ultimate Warranty of Wisconsin Inc, Ultimate Warranty of Ohio Inc and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
