Cases 51 - 54 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2006md01775
Defendant:
One or more Defendants in 06-cv-3978, JSNP, INC v. ACE Aviation Holdings, INC, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-1503, Rosetti Handbags and Accessories, Ltd. v. Air France ADS et al, One or more Defendants in 06-cv-2157, Perlman v. British Airways PLC et al and others
Interested Party:
John Doe, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-2260, Antell v. British Airways PLC et al, One or more Plaintiffs in 06-cv-706 Fleurchem, Inc. v. British Airways et al, DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc.,11-cv-00564 and others
In Re:
Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Intervenor:
US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
Not Classified By Court:
Brickman Concerts Inc. and I.O.D. Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In Re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2006md01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453 and others
Defendant:
Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453 and others
Amicu:
Ministry of Commerce for the Peoples Republic of China and Ministry of Commerce for the Peoples Republic of China
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
