Cases 51 - 60 of 2,198
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 24-106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, "OBSERVER", "Q" and others
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vasquez Trejo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4446
Petitioner:
EDNA GUADALUPE VASQUEZ TREJO and DIANA LIZBETH GONZALES VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
A., et al. v. County of San Bernardino, et al.
as 23-4180
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. A., a minor by and through his Guardian ad litem Cindy Plasencia, as successor in interest to Juan Antonio Ayon Ruiz, JOSE JUAN AYON ROMERO, parent of decedent and MARIA DOLORES RUIZ VASQUEZ, parent of decedent
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ED FAKHOURY, Deputy and BRANDON BECKER, Deputy
Vasquez Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4059
Petitioner:
HILDA ELUVIA VASQUEZ GONZALEZ and ROMEO SANTOS VASQUEZ GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez v. Garland
as 23-4087
Petitioner:
TANISH VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez-Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3918
Petitioner:
XIOMARA YANETH SANCHEZ-VASQUEZ and MICHAEL OMAR ARGUETA-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Carlos Vasquez
as 23-13918
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS VASQUEZ
Gonzalez-Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3772
Petitioner:
SONIA YAMILETH GONZALEZ-VASQUEZ, ANDREA ALEJANDRA ESTRADA-GONZALEZ and ABNER JOSUE ESTRADA-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
