Cases 61 - 70 of 170
RATCHFORD et al v. YESTOFFLO, LLC
as 2:2017cv13109
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL RATCHFORD , ANA CHERI , BROOKE MARRIN and others
Defendant:
YESTOFFLO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11944
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fram v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv10633
Plaintiff:
Jessica Fram
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Access Mechanisms Actions - End Payor Actions
as 2:2016cv04103
Plaintiff:
Halley Ascher , Gregory Asken , Melissa Barron and others
Defendant:
Alpha Corporation and Alpha Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Brake Hoses - End-Payor Actions
as 2:2016cv03603
Plaintiff:
Halley Ascher , Gregory Asken , Melissa Barron and others
Defendant:
Toyoda Gosei Co., LTD. , Toyoda Gosei North American Corporation , TG Kentucky, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Access Mechanisms Actions
as 2:2016cv04100
Plaintiff:
Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Empire Nissan of Santa Rosa, LLC , V.I.P. Motor Cars Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Alpha Corporation and Alpha Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Jones v. University of Phoenix, Incorporated
as 2:2017cv10198
Defendant:
University of Phoenix, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jessica A Jones
Alexander v. Oakland County Prosecutor Jessica R. Cooper, et al
as 2:2016cv14231
Defendant:
Oakland County Prosecutor Jessica R. Cooper
Plaintiff:
Ronald Paul Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
