Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Ferris v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01407
Plaintiff:
William Ferris
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc. and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Excel Fortress Limited v. Wilhelm et al
as 4:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Excel Fortress Limited
Defendant:
Vaughn La Verl Wilhelm and John/Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Campos v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A. et al
as 5:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Norma Campos
Defendant:
DOE 1-5 and Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cunningham v. Channer LLC
as 3:2017cv00546
Defendant:
Telemarketers, Channer LLC, Jerome Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Cunningham and Craig Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seramur v. Rotobrush International LLC et al
as 4:2016cv01087
Plaintiff:
Dennis R Seramur
Defendant:
Rotobrush International LLC , John Does 1-5 and Profax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Payne v. TACS III, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Timothy Payne
Defendant:
TACS III, LLC, David Michael Carr, Midwestern Alliance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LLC v. America, Inc et al
as 4:2016mc00016
Plaintiff:
Consumer Services LLC
Defendant:
Cold Coffee America, Inc, Darrell Creswell, John and/or Jane Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nicole Campos v. National Portfolio Services, Inc., et al
as 5:2015cv00941
Plaintiff:
Nicole Campos
Defendant:
DOE 1-5 and National Portfolio Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Yoo v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00720
Defendant:
DOE 1-5 and NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JiHyun Yoo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
