Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Interstate Natural Gas Assoc. v. EPA
as 16-1263
Petitioner:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others
Independent Petroleum Assoc., et al v. EPA
as 16-1262
Petitioner:
Independent Petroleum Association of America, American Exploration & Production Council, Domestic Energy Producers Alliance and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others
Texas Oil and Gas Association v. EPA, et al
as 16-1269
Petitioner:
Texas Oil and Gas Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Gina McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others
GPA Midstream Association v. EPA, et al
as 16-1267
Petitioner:
GPA Midstream Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Gina McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others
American Petroleum Institute v. EPA
as 16-1270
Petitioner:
American Petroleum Institute
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1257
Petitioner:
State of Texas, Railroad Commission of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others
Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. National Park Service et al
as 2:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council , Center for Biological Diversity , National Parks Conservation Association and others
Defendant:
National Park Service , Sally Jewell , Jonathan B. Jarvis and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Burnett Oil Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 16-8069
Intervenor / Appellee:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE, STATE OF UTAH and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Respondent:
SALLY JEWELL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, RYAN ZINKE and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, FORMER OFFICIALS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF WYOMING and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF COLORADO, THE STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Intervenor:
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
State of Wyoming, et al v. Jewell, et al
as 16-8068
Petitioner - Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF COLORADO, INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Respondent - Appellant:
SALLY JEWELL, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, UTE INDIAN TRIBE and STATE OF UTAH
Intervenor:
SIERRA CLUB, EARTHWORKS, WESTERN RESOURCE ADVOCATES and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF WYOMING
State of Wyoming, et al v. Zinke, et al
as 16-8068
Intervenor:
CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND, WILDERNESS SOCIETY, SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALASKA, FORMER OFFICIALS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE, STATE OF UTAH and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Respondent:
NEIL KORNZE, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, RYAN ZINKE and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF COLORADO, THE STATE OF WYOMING, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
