Other Statutes Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 61 - 70 of 85
GRAY v. GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C., et al
as 2:2011cv01623
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER J. GRAY
Defendant: GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C. and ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv07125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOREWOOD v. DOYLESTOWN ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv05320
Plaintiff: GORDON MOREWOOD
Defendant: DOYLESTOWN ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, INC., TODD H. BROAD, RAYMOND M. JOSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
KIRGIN et al v. GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C.
as 2:2010cv03855
Plaintiff: ROBERT KIRGIN and VICTORIA KIRGIN
Defendant: GORDON & WEINBERG, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Alexander
as 3:2010mc00231
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Kerry Gordon Alexander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00569
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00192
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff: J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?