Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Manuel Hernandez-Portillo, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-73009
Petitioner:
MANUEL DE JESUS HERNANDEZ-PORTILLO and CARMEN IVETH NERIO-VENEGAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez
as 10-10247
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS ORLANDO HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ, AKA Jesus Hernandez-Ramirez, AKA Jesus Orlando Hernandez
Jamie Hernandez-Mejia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-3316
Petitioner:
JAMIE DE JESUS HERNANDEZ-MEJIA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
USA v. Jesus Cortez-Lopez
as 09-50839
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS CORTEZ-LOPEZ, also known as Mario Hernandez-Rodriguez, also known as Jesus Hernandez-Lopez, also known as Juan Lopez
Manuel Hernandez-Adames v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3990
Petitioner:
MANUEL DE JESUS HERNANDEZ-ADAMES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Laura Hernandez-Guevara v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70823
Petitioner:
LAURA DE JESUS HERNANDEZ-GUEVARA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Regino Curin Lorenzo et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00199
Plaintiff:
Ines Vincente Guerra Sagastume, Neftali Franco Acevedo, Gamaliel Garcia Aldana and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Armando Hernandez-Ramirez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70660
Petitioner:
ARMANDO DE JESUS HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jesus Hernandez-Andrade v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70452
Petitioner:
JESUS HERNANDEZ-ANDRADE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Hernandez-Hernandez
as 09-20067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESUS HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.