Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Brown v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. et al
as 1:2011mc00210
Petitioner:
Charles S. Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. and US National Bank Association
Cause Of Action: Miscellaneous Application
BROWN et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00591
Petitioner:
BRENT B BROWN, BRENT S BROWN and STEPHANIE S BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
In re: Daniel Scott Brown
as 11-80223
Respondent:
In re: DANIEL S. BROWN, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 29, 1992
Brown v. The Law Offices of Sidney Mickell et al
as 9:2011cv80828
Plaintiff:
Ralston S. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
The Law Offices of Sidney Mickell and CACH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Konicoff et al
as 7:2011cv04128
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gloria M. Konicoff, Estate of Sol Konicoff, The Sol Konicoff Living Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Brown v. Stephens & Michaels Associates, Inc.
as 9:2011cv80581
Plaintiff:
Ralston S. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephens & Michaels Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown v. eBay Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01134
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Brown
Defendant:
eBay Inc. and PayPal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KAUFMAN et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2010cv01610
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PHILIP KAUFMAN and MICHAEL NORLEY
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT 32-2-49 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BROWN v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04436
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S. BROWN
Defendant:
EBAY, INC. and PAYPAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Samuel S. Brown, et al. v. AC and S Inc., et al.
as MIE/2:91-CV-72010
Defendant:
AC and S Inc
Plaintiff:
Samuel S. Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
