Cases 61 - 70 of 275
Wilansky v. United States of America et al
as 0:2018cv00316
Petitioner:
Sophia Wilansky
Respondent:
United States of America , Gary Lee Delorme , Brian James Vanoosbree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
United States of America v. $20,060.00 in U.S. Currency
as 0:2017mc00070
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$20,060.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Katrina Woods
Type:
Other Statutes
United States of America v. 1. $42,430.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 0:2017mc00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$42,430.00 in U.S. Currency and $2,800.00 in Postal Money Orders
Type:
Other Statutes
Tawakal Halal LLC et al v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv04732
Plaintiff:
Tawakal Halal LLC and Abdifateh Mohamed Omar
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. City of Cass Lake, Minnesota
as 0:2017cv04367
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of Cass Lake, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
United States of America v. CEI Community Ventures, LLC
as 0:2017mc00046
United States of America v. $63,760.79 In Funds From Bank of America Account No. 374000279538 et al
as 0:2017mc00042
Defendant:
$63,760.79 In Funds From Bank of America Account No. 374000279538
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Malik Alkamel
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. United States of America et al
as 0:2017cv03690
Plaintiff:
Regents of the University of Minnesota
Defendant:
United States of America and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
United States of America v. Harwell
as 0:2017mc00036
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wilbur G. Harwell
United States of America et al v. XIK, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv02368
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Minnesota, The and State of Wisconsin, The
Defendant:
XIK, LLC, Domtar, Inc. and Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
