Cases 71 - 80 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
ALLMAN et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2012cv00568
Plaintiff:
ROBIN ALLMAN, MARGARET BAUGHER, MARK BAUGHER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON and KEVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PECOVER et al v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2012mc00021
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
ANDREW OWENS and GEOFFREY PECOVER
YEAMAN et al v. HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO.
as 1:2011mc00095
Defendant:
HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO.
Plaintiff:
CATHY YEAMAN, DILLON ANDREW YEAMAN and MICHAEL YEAMAN
WALKER et al v. BLEEKER BRODEY & ANDREWS
as 1:2011cv01037
Defendant:
BLEEKER BRODEY & ANDREWS
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALKER and MEREDITH WALKER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VEST
as 1:2011mc00094
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
ANDREW JASON VEST
CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS, INC. et al v. LAHOOD et al
as 1:2011cv01031
Plaintiff:
ANN M. BAAS, LYNNE BERGH, JANICE ANN BOYD and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. CLINE, RAY LAHOOD, VICTOR MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
