Cases 71 - 80 of 107
USA v. Cliven Bundy, et al
as 17-10000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CLIVEN D. BUNDY, RYAN BUNDY, AMMON BUNDY and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
BATTLE BORN MEDIA, LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL and ASSOCIATED PRESS
USA v. Ammon Bundy
as 16-30179
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMMON BUNDY
USA v. Ammon Bundy
as 16-30179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMMON BUNDY
USA v. Ammon Bundy, et al
as 16-30080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMMON BUNDY, RYAN PAYNE, BRIAN CAVALIER and others
Cliven Bundy v. USDC-NVL
as 16-72275
:
In re: CLIVEN D. BUNDY
Petitioner:
CLIVEN D. BUNDY, AKA Cliven Bundy
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY v. CORYELL et al
as 2:2015cv02534
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY
Defendant:
EDWARD CORYELL, SR., EDWARD CORYELL, JR., J. R. HOCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re: Antonio Bundy
as 15-1788
Petitioner:
ANTONIO J. BUNDY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Linda Grubbs, et al v. Sheakley Group, Inc., et al
as 15-3302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA GRUBBS, TRI-SERVE, LTD, TRI-SERVE 1, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SHEAKLEY GROUP, INC., SHEAKLEY BENEFIT PLANS AGENCY, INC., SHEAKLEY HR, LLC, dba Sheakley HR Solutions and others
Bundy et al v. Obama et al
as 3:2014cv00256
Plaintiff:
Cliven Bundy and David Rothrock
Defendant:
Bureau Of Land Management, Dept. of the Interior and Barack Hussein Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Paragon Micro, Inc. v. Bundy et al
as 1:2014cv00203
Plaintiff:
Paragon Micro, Inc.
Defendant:
Nicholas J. Bundy and NJB Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
