Cases 71 - 80 of 1,281
Martin Defense Group, LLC v. Kao
as 1:2022cv00283
Defendant:
Tiffany Jennifer Lam, Martin Kao, Jenny Lam and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Defense Group, LLC and Navatek Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00776
Plaintiff:
Adams, Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Kent v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
FLORES et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
RUBEN V. FLORES, DELIA D. FLORES, JOSHUA D. FLORES and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
In re: Clifford Cheah King Mun et al
as 1:2022mc00243
Petitioner:
Clifford Cheah King Mun and Maso Capital Investments Limited
Respondent:
Evercore Inc. and Jardine Strategic Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nathan v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04140
Plaintiff:
Miriam Nathan
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Stein v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02903
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
WHITFIELD v. LHC GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01862
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
LHC GROUP, INC., KEITH G MYERS, MONICA F AZARE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
