Cases 71 - 80 of 600
Whitfield v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Reveta Bowers, Robert Corti and others
Solomon Rubin v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., et al
as 2:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Solomon Rubin
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc.,, Reveta Bowers, Robert Corti and others
Stein v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Reveta Bowers, Robert Corti and others
Kyle Watson v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Kyle Watson
Defendant:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Reveta Bowers, Robert Corti and others
Wang v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01388
Plaintiff:
Xiu Jin WANG
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Connie Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LIN v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Mei Lin
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Connie Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chen v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Li Jie CHEN
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
FRIEDMAN et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
DELTON FREDERICK FRIEDMAN, KARINA ELENA VELASCO OLIVERA and DELTON MCLEOD FRIEDMAN
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR JADDOU, CONNIE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
IFTEKHAR et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED ANDALEEB IFTEKHAR and SAMARA SABNAM POROMA
Defendant:
Director UR JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CONNIE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
