Cases 71 - 80 of 155
Earnest v. San Joaquin County, et al.
as 2:2016cv01064
Defendant:
San Joaquin County, San Joaquin General Hospital, Marshay Mcknight and others
Plaintiff:
Lillie Earnest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
J and J Sports Productions Inc v. John Mark Peterson et al
as 5:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Marhol Holdings, Inc. and John Mark Peterson
Peterson et al v. Direct Coast to Coast, LLC et al
as 3:2016mc80079
Plaintiff:
Tami K. Peterson and Joseph Peterson
Defendant:
Direct Coast to Coast, LLC and Selective Transportation Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson et al v. Direct Coast to Coast, LLC et al
as 2:2016mc00043
Defendant:
Direct Coast to Coast, LLC and Selective Transportation Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joseph Peterson and Tami K Peterson
Peterson et al v. Direct Coast to Coast, LLC et al
as 3:2016mc00362
Plaintiff:
Tami K. Peterson and Joseph Peterson
Defendant:
Direct Coast to Coast, LLC and Selective Transportation Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Talbert v. Mattson Technology, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00811
Defendant:
Mattson Technology, Inc., Fusen E. Chen, Kenneth Kannappan and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Talbert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ryan Corley, Samuel Frank, Nicholas Corpuz and others
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Angel Ortiz Diamond v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv06493
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Clark Family Company, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz Diamond, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
