Cases 71 - 80 of 176
Pimentel v. Atrium Hospitality LP et al
as 5:2019cv01284
Defendant:
Samuel Schwartz, Atrium Hospitality LP, Peter Komar and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Pimentel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Pimentel v. Schwenker
as 19-2510
Defendant / Appellee:
Clifford Schwenker, individually, Marcy J. Davidson, individually, Bill Ittounas, individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicholas Pimentel
Pimentel v. Ricotta & Marks, P.C.
as 1:2019cv07437
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Pimentel and Aasir Azzarmi
Defendant:
Ricotta & Marks, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Pimentel v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
as 19-2376
Defendant / Appellee:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Tanya Morgan, individually and Sergey Yeremeyev, individually
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicholas Pimentel, AKA Aasir Azzarmi
Pimentel v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
as 19-2343
Defendant / Appellee:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Tanya Morgan, individually and Sergey Yeremeyev, individually
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicholas Pimentel, AKA Aasir Azzarmi
USA v. Rogelio Pimentel
as 19-12795
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGELIO ISRAEL PIMENTEL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: New York City Board of
as 19-2254
Plaintiff:
Mayling Ralph, Elsa Gulino, Peter Wilds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Maribel A. Pimentel
Daniel Pimentel-Herrera v. William Barr
as 19-71717
Petitioner:
DANIEL ORLANDO PIMENTEL-HERRERA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Ricardo Maciel-Pimentel, et al v. William Barr
as 19-71037
Petitioner:
ESTELA TORRES MACIEL and RICARDO MACIEL-PIMENTEL
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
In Re: Nicholas Pimentel
as 19-552
Respondent:
Tanya Morgan, individually, Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Sergey Yeremeyev, individually
Petitioner:
Nicholas Pimentel, AKA Aasir Azzarmi
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
